AI image generation
I’ve been thinking a lot about ethics around Undress AI image generation lately, especially tools that can modify photos in ways that weren’t possible before. On one hand, it’s fascinating tech and clearly here to stay. On the other, I’m not always sure where personal responsibility starts and ends. If someone uploads an image they don’t own, or uses AI in a way that feels invasive, is that on the user, the platform, or both? Curious how others here see it, especially people who’ve actually tried these tools and thought about the consequences.
4 Views
This is something I’ve struggled with too, mostly because the technology itself is pretty neutral, but the way people use it definitely isn’t. I’ve tested a few AI image generators out of pure curiosity, not really for shock value, and what stood out to me was how easy it is to forget there’s a real person behind most photos. That’s where responsibility kicks in. Platforms can add rules, filters, and warnings, but they can’t control intent. For example, sites like Undress AI
clearly explain what the tool does, but they also put the burden on the user to act responsibly. From my experience, the ethical line is consent. If the image is yours, or clearly fictional, fine. If it’s not, that’s where it becomes uncomfortable fast. I don’t think banning the tech works, but education and clearer norms probably do.